> > Ah, I understand the problem now. We can't have a multiple irqs of the > *same* *type* > pending at the same time, but we /can/ have multiple irqs of *different* > *types* pending > at the same time (i.e. a ckc and service signal).
Indeed, at least for these types of external interrupts. (if I remember correctly, previous TCG versions did this wrong but I fixed it :) ) > > Thanks for clearing this up for me. I was over thinking the problem and > I agree that > a print would be the easiest solution. :) > -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
