On 12/07/2017 03:14 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We were passing a NULL error pointer to the object_property_set_bool()
> call that realizes the CPU object. This meant that we wouldn't detect
> failure, and would plough blindly on to crash later trying to use a
> NULL CPU object pointer. Detect errors and fail instead.
> 
> In particular, this will be necessary to detect the user error
> of using "-cpu host" without "-enable-kvm" once we make the host
> CPU type be registered unconditionally rather than only in
> kvm_arch_init().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>

> ---
>  hw/arm/virt.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
> index 151592b..62af013 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ static void machvirt_init(MachineState *machine)
>                                       "secure-memory", &error_abort);
>          }
>  
> -        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, true, "realized", NULL);
> +        object_property_set_bool(cpuobj, true, "realized", &error_fatal);
>          object_unref(cpuobj);
>      }
>      fdt_add_timer_nodes(vms);
> 

Reply via email to