On 21 November 2017 at 15:18, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 21/11/2017 16:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The memory-internal.h header claims that it is for "obsolete
>> exec.c functions" which "will be removed soon". This statement
>> was added in 2011, six years ago, but the header is still here.
>> (Admittedly none of the prototypes added in commit 67d95c153bef55f6
>> are still in the header.)
>>
>> It's convenient to have a place to put prototypes for functions
>> which are used internally to the various .c files of the memory
>> system or by the accel/tcg code, which is inevitably fairly
>> closely coupled. So keep the header but update the comments to
>> reflect what we're actually using it for.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>

Ping? Paolo, I was expecting this to go in via your tree --
should it go somewhere else instead?

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to