On 01/15/2018 06:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > (may be worth mentioning > in particular how "rIM" differs from "rINK" -- I think the answer is that > we want to say "valid-immediate OR (valid-if-inverted AND valid-if-negated)", > whereas 'rINK' is "valid-immediate OR valid-if-inverted OR valid-if-negated".)
I also just realized that N & K is only true for -256 thru -1. Which is certainly a simpler test to go with that verbiage. r~
