From: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Use of a do/while(0) control flow in order to permit an early break is an unusual paradigm, and triggers a false positive with a planned future syntax check against 'while (0);'. Rewrite the code to use a goto instead. This patch temporarily keeps an extra level of indentation to highlight the change; the next patch cleans it up.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20171201232433.25193-4-ebl...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> --- chardev/char-serial.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/chardev/char-serial.c b/chardev/char-serial.c index 2f8f838..10162f9 100644 --- a/chardev/char-serial.c +++ b/chardev/char-serial.c @@ -64,9 +64,14 @@ static void tty_serial_init(int fd, int speed, #endif tcgetattr(fd, &tty); -#define check_speed(val) if (speed <= val) { spd = B##val; break; } +#define check_speed(val) \ + if (speed <= val) { \ + spd = B##val; \ + goto done; \ + } + speed = speed * 10 / 11; - do { + { check_speed(50); check_speed(75); check_speed(110); @@ -125,8 +130,10 @@ static void tty_serial_init(int fd, int speed, check_speed(4000000); #endif spd = B115200; - } while (0); + } +#undef check_speed + done: cfsetispeed(&tty, spd); cfsetospeed(&tty, spd); -- 1.8.3.1