On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 04:15:18PM -0300, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:21 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > This device is only used on mips, move to the correct maintainer > > section. > > > > Cc: Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> > > Cc: Yongbok Kim <yongbok....@mips.com> > > Cc: Hervé Poussineau <hpous...@reactos.org> > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 0255113..ab30f1f 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ F: include/hw/intc/mips_gic.h > > F: include/hw/timer/mips_gictimer.h > > F: tests/tcg/mips/ > > F: disas/mips.c > > +F: hw/isa/piix4.c > > NACK this isn't the correct section (MIPS architecture), > > The section you want to update is the "Malta board" one. > > Now the 82371 devices are broadly use with X86 machines, so I am a bit > reluctant to this change. > > Maybe I am misunderstanding the 'X86 machines PC' entry, but I see you > are the unique maintainer of this entry which status is "Supported: > Someone is actually paid to look after this". > My guess is you are paid to work on _recent_ PC machines and you are > probably receiving too many patches.
As I said, I don't test mips. As long as isa/piix is not event built on x86, it doesn't make sense for me to merge patches. > I suggest we split this section in "recent PC" vs "outdated PC". > It might be hard to draw a line, but maybe i440FX vs Q35 is a good one. > If you agree to unburden some files you don't find relevant to the > "recent PC" entry, > Hervé and I volunteer for the "outdated PC" one with a "Odd Fixes" status > (has a maintainer but they don't have time to do much other than throw > the odd patch in). That's not a level of support i440fx needs though, it's used in production on too many systems. > I hope you won't take this suggestion badly, we just offer help :) > > Regards, > > Phil. For things that are actually used with x86 guests, I think we are good, Marcel recently joined with that. I'd like to split out pc bits that are not used with x86 guests. > > Moxie > > M: Anthony Green <gr...@moxielogic.com> > > @@ -849,7 +850,6 @@ F: hw/pci-host/q35.c > > F: hw/pci-host/pam.c > > F: include/hw/pci-host/q35.h > > F: include/hw/pci-host/pam.h > > -F: hw/isa/piix4.c > > F: hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c > > F: hw/i2c/smbus_ich9.c > > F: hw/acpi/piix4.c > > -- > > MST
