On 04.01.2018 18:10, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 04/01/2018 16:59, Thomas Huth wrote: >> >> But instead of introducing a new "-braille" parameter, maybe we should >> rather keep some of the convenience "-usbdevice" possibilities around? >> E.g. keep "-usbdevice braille", "-usbdevice mouse", etc. but remove >> things like "-usbdevice serial" and "-usbdevice host" where the code is >> rather ugly and the user do not gain much in comparison to "-device" ? > > That would work too. But I'm not sure why keep all the usbdevice > infrastructure when we can do the same (at the price of a small cmdline > incompatibility) with only 50 lines of code.
I'm just afraid that we will end up with more new parameters in the end than just "-braille" - or do we feel confident enough that "-usbdevice braille" is the only one that would need a sugared replacement? Thomas
