On 18/12/2017 13:54, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 15/12/2017 19:18, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>>> Instead of an error, lower to a warning message, assuming the comment
>>> gives some justification.
>>>
>>> Discussed in:
>>> '[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] dump-guest-memory.py: fix "You can't do that without
>>> a process to debug"'
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
>>
>> We can drop the error at all if there is a comment. Also, "volatile
>> sig_atomic_t" is probably self-explanatory and usually correct. So what
>> about this:
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> index f5a523af10..3dc27d9656 100755
>> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
>> @@ -2475,13 +2475,11 @@ sub process {
>>
>> # no volatiles please
>> my $asm_volatile =
>> qr{\b(__asm__|asm)\s+(__volatile__|volatile)\b};
>> - if ($line =~ /\bvolatile\b/ && $line !~ /$asm_volatile/) {
>> - my $msg = "Use of volatile is usually wrong: see
>> Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt\n" . $herecurr;
>> - if (ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {
>> - WARN($msg);
>> - } else {
>> - ERROR($msg);
>> - }
>> + if ($line =~ /\bvolatile\b/ && $line !~ /$asm_volatile/ &&
>> + $line !~ /sig_atomic_t/ &&
>> + !ctx_has_comment($first_line, $linenr)) {
>> + my $msg = "Use of volatile is usually wrong, please
>> add a comment\n" . $herecurr;
>> + ERROR($msg);
>> }
>>
>
> Fine for me, can you send a proper patch?
Yes, will do.
Paolo
