On 15 December 2017 at 20:37, Wei Huang <w...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This patch adds the migration test support for aarch64. The test code,
> which implements the same functionality as x86, is compiled into a binary
> and booted as a kernel to qemu. Here are the design ideas:
>
> * We choose this -kernel design because aarch64 QEMU doesn't provide a
> built-in fw like x86 does. So instead of relying on a boot loader, we
> use -kernel approach for aarch64.
> * The serial output is sent to PL011 directly.
> * The physical memory base for mach-virt machine is 0x40000000. We have
> to change the start_address and end_address for aarch64.
> * The downtime is changed from 0.001 to 0.1. Without this change, we saw
> migration stalled. This problem is still under analysis and needs to be
> resolved before removing RFC for this patch.
>
> The test code is as the following:
>
> .section .text
> #if defined(__linux__)
> @@ -125,6 +125,18 @@ unsigned char bootsect[] = {
> 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x55, 0xaa
> };
>
> +unsigned char aarch64_kernel[] = {
> + 0x00, 0x10, 0x38, 0xd5, 0x00, 0xf8, 0x7f, 0x92, 0x00, 0x10, 0x18, 0xd5,
> + 0xdf, 0x3f, 0x03, 0xd5, 0x24, 0x08, 0x80, 0x52, 0x05, 0x20, 0xa1, 0xd2,
> + 0xa4, 0x00, 0x00, 0x39, 0x06, 0x00, 0x80, 0x52, 0x03, 0xc8, 0xa8, 0xd2,
> + 0x02, 0x02, 0xa8, 0xd2, 0x41, 0x00, 0x40, 0x39, 0x21, 0x04, 0x00, 0x11,
> + 0x41, 0x00, 0x00, 0x39, 0x42, 0x04, 0x40, 0x91, 0x5f, 0x00, 0x03, 0xeb,
> + 0x6b, 0xff, 0xff, 0x54, 0xc6, 0x04, 0x00, 0x11, 0xc6, 0x1c, 0x00, 0x12,
> + 0xdf, 0x00, 0x00, 0x71, 0xc1, 0xfe, 0xff, 0x54, 0x44, 0x08, 0x80, 0x52,
> + 0x05, 0x20, 0xa1, 0xd2, 0xa4, 0x00, 0x00, 0x39, 0xf2, 0xff, 0xff, 0x97
> +};
> +unsigned int aarch64_kernel_len = 96;
I'm not really a fan of this steadily increasing number of hex-encoded
target binary blobs in the tests directory, but if we must, I
think this would be easier to read as an array of uint32_t,
so that each entry is one instruction word.
(If your claim is that nobody cares about the hex because
they'll just rebuild from the source code in the commit
message, I would suggest that that makes the source code
the 'preferred form for modification' under the GPL...)
But I think at some point we really need to stop doing
this and instead figure out a mechanism for building
target code as part of the QEMU build-and-test.
It is coming up increasingly often:
* code to run on the guest in tests
* the bios blobs (at the moment we special case
the x86 bios blobs and assume we can compile them
with the host C compiler, which is not great)
* for linux-user on several architectures we would like
to properly implement a guest VDSO
thanks
-- PMM
