On 12 December 2017 at 02:48, Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 08:55:56PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 11 December 2017 at 19:42, Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 17:32:48 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> >> Thanks. I think I have come down on the side of putting this into >> >> 2.11, so rolling an rc5 today, and delaying the final release >> >> a day to Wednesday. >> > >> > Glad to see it's in -rc5 -- thanks for fixing this so quickly! >> > >> > Again, apologies for not having caught this earlier ;-( >> >> It's my own fault really -- my extremely ad-hoc approach >> to testing for Arm guests was bound to come back and >> bite me sooner or later. > > Should we include the vfio fix in too for rc5? > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/844940/ > > I see that the tag is there already, not sure whether it means it > missed the chance again... Thanks,
It did miss the chance, but in any case that vfio fix is not a regression from 2.10, so it doesn't meet the criteria to go in now. thanks -- PMM
