On 11/28/2017 03:10 PM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> There are 2 cases I have spotted so far:
> 1) IDE ATAPI read processing. Actually this was reported from field
> 2) QEMU IO hmp command (found during evaluation of (1))
>
> SCSI code checks during access that blk_is_available(). These patches add
> same checks on different code paths.
>
> Pls decide whether these patches should go through sub-system trees or via
> block tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <d...@openvz.org>
> CC: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> CC: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
>
any decision on this?

Reply via email to