On Fri, 12/08 08:42, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On Thu, 12/07 10:53, Eric Blake wrote: > >> On 12/07/2017 04:58 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > >> > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:44:53PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > [...] > >> >> +it less likely to conflict with a running guest's permissions due to > >> >> image > >> >> +locking. For example, this can be used to get the image information > >> >> (with > >> >> +'info' subcommand) when the image is used by a running guest. Note > >> >> that this > >> >> +could produce inconsistent result because of concurrent metadata > >> >> changes, etc.. > >> > > >> > Super nit-pick: an ellipsis[*] is three dots :-), so, when applying you > >> > might want to: s/../.../ > >> > > >> > [*] https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/ellipsis > >> > >> Except that both "etc." and "..." independently convey a sense of > >> continuation, which means that using both at once is both redundant > >> (just one will do) and difficult to argue how to typeset (since 'etc.' > >> is often written with an explicit '.' to emphasize that is an > >> abbreviation, does that mean you have to write 'etc.''...' for a total > >> of 4 dots?). > > > > I have the impression that "etc." is more correct than "etc" > > It is. > > > so I used even > > at > > the end of the sensence where there is another period '.', making it > > "etc..". > > That's wrong all the same :) > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(punctuation)#Abbreviations > > > If ending the paragraph with "etc." is enough, we can drop one ".". > > Please do.
Yes, thanks, v2 sent. Fam
