Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
> "cpu-index" is better name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx
> index 4befbe2..8de7aa3 100644
> --- a/hmp-commands.hx
> +++ b/hmp-commands.hx
> @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ ETEXI
> #if defined(TARGET_I386)
> {
> .name = "nmi",
> - .args_type = "cpu_index:i",
> + .args_type = "cpu-index:i",
> .params = "cpu",
> .help = "inject an NMI on the given CPU",
> .mhandler.cmd = do_inject_nmi,
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 5d74fe3..c16b39d 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -2410,7 +2410,7 @@ static void do_wav_capture(Monitor *mon, const QDict
> *qdict)
> static void do_inject_nmi(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
> {
> CPUState *env;
> - int cpu_index = qdict_get_int(qdict, "cpu_index");
> + int cpu_index = qdict_get_int(qdict, "cpu-index");
>
> for (env = first_cpu; env != NULL; env = env->next_cpu)
> if (env->cpu_index == cpu_index) {
Fine with me, but it would be nice if we could make up our mind once and
for all whether to use dash or underscore in monitor commands and
arguments.
