Am 27.11.2017 um 14:00 hat Kashyap Chamarthy geschrieben: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:53:07PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 21.11.2017 um 12:52 hat Kashyap Chamarthy geschrieben: > > [...] > > > > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> > > > > > +(1) Issuing the command ``block-job-cancel`` (after it emits the event > > > + ``BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETED``) will create a point-in-time (which is at > > > + the time of *triggering* the cancel command) copy of the entire disk > > > image chain (or only the top-most image, depending on the ``sync`` > > > - mode). > > > + mode), contained in the target image [E]. One use case for this is > > > + live storage migration. > > > > As commented on v4, > > You're right, I agree with your comment on v4. > > > I dropped the last sentence here for now. Please > > suggest an unambiguous wording if you'd prefer to keep it. > > If you can still add, and are happy with it, please go with the less > ambiguous wording: "One use case for this is live VM migration with > non-shared storage". > > Just that I feel it immediately gives the use case in context.
Ok, I'll change it accordingly. Kevin
