On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
> On 17/11/17 14:53, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
>> <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
>>> Since the EBus is effectively a PCI-ISA bridge then the underlying ISA bus
>>> should be contained within the PCI bridge itself.
>>
>> While it's like that on the Sabre chipset, the Spitfire chipset (which
>> I hope to add at some point) has the EBus, but no PCI, so maybe it's
>> better to model it separately.
>> On the other hand, the Spitfire has different EBus devices
>> (particularly different type of the serial ports), so I'm not sure.
>
> Oh I didn't realise you had more plans in this area :)  Any idea when
> you'll be able to work on the them?

After I make AIX boot. :-)

> TBH as you probably already know,
> even the patchset in its current form with the ISA bus encapsulation is
> so much better than what is already there, so I'd prefer to merge it and
> help you work through any problems later unless you feel particularly
> strongly?

Ok, let's do it.

Reviewed-by: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4q...@gmail.com>

-- 
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko

SPARC and PPC PReP under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu

Reply via email to