On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
This is another possibility:
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 97a24a875e..3bb9fcf257 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -410,22 +410,16 @@ static MemoryRegionSection
*address_space_lookup_region(AddressSpaceDispatch *d,
{
MemoryRegionSection *section = atomic_read(&d->mru_section);
subpage_t *subpage;
- bool update;
- if (section && section != &d->map.sections[PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED] &&
- section_covers_addr(section, addr)) {
- update = false;
- } else {
+ if (!section || section == &d->map.sections[PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED] ||
+ !section_covers_addr(section, addr)) {
section = phys_page_find(d, addr);
- update = true;
+ atomic_set(&d->mru_section, section);
}
if (resolve_subpage && section->mr->subpage) {
subpage = container_of(section->mr, subpage_t, iomem);
section = &d->map.sections[subpage->sub_section[SUBPAGE_IDX(addr)]];
}
- if (update) {
- atomic_set(&d->mru_section, section);
- }
return section;
}
It will skip the expensive phys_page_find but not the cheap subpage lookup.
Does it work for you?
This also works but I can't understand why becuase the problematic call to
this function which got the wrong result from section_covers_addr was with
resolve_subpage=false and in that case this looks identical to the
original which did not work. Unless this function is called multiple times
and another call with resolve_subpage=true now somehow works better with
this change or replacing the mru_section earlier before subpage lookup
makes a difference which is not obvious from this function.
Anyway, it fixes the problem I see so you can use this instead of my
patch.
Thank you,
BALATON Zoltan