Hi,
It could be that the implementation decides to not handle synchroneous commands synchroneous at all. The main difference I'm trying to make here is between commands which do things to end points which cannot be done while other packets are in flight (like setting configuration, or interface alt setting) and commands (normal packets) of which there can be multiple in flight. I'm open to using a different term then synchroneous and async here.
Name them control / data packets? cheers, Gerd
