Hi Markus,
On 10/09/2017 03:46 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Please cc me on changes to stuff I maintain, as scripts/get_maintainer
> tells you :)
Oops I might have been a copy/paste error.
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>> ---
>> scripts/coverity-model.c | 2 +-
[...]
>> GIOChannel *g_io_channel_unix_new(int fd)
>> {
>> - GIOChannel *c = g_malloc0(sizeof(GIOChannel));
>> + GIOChannel *c = g_new0(GIOChannel, 1);
>> __coverity_escape__(fd);
>> return c;
>> }
>
> Hmm.
>
> The Coverity model carefully explains g_malloc0(). It doesn't explain
> g_new0(). With any luck, Coverity can see through g_new0() --- it's a
> macro in my <gmem.h>. But why complicate matters? The normal reason
> for changing g_malloc0() to g_new0() doesn't apply here. Let's leave
> the model alone.
Yes you are right.
