Hi Eduardo,
Thanks for your reply.
At 10/21/2017 03:15 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:50:32AM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
At 10/18/2017 11:48 AM, Dou Liyang wrote:
As QEMU supports the memory-less node, it is possible that there is
no RAM in the first numa node(also be called as node0). eg:
... \
-m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G \
-numa node -numa node,mem=128M \
But, this makes it hard for QEMU to build a known-to-work ACPI SRAT
table. Only fixing it is not enough.
Add a testcase for this situation to make sure the ACPI table is
correct for guest.
Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Changelog:
This patch can pass the 'make check' in Peter's machine,
Oops, s/can/can not :-).
Thanks,
dou.
But, in my own and Eduardo's machine, we can pass it.
So I rebase and spilt it independently.
Thanks!
Peter:
could you help me test it in your machine.
then, give me the output files, such as /tmp/asl-6QYK7Y.dsl and
/tmp/asl-1H1I7Y.dsl file.
As the failures reported by Peter were about the *.memhp test
case files, I think this patch is unlikely to be the cause of
those failures. I believe the problem is at:
From: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 10:10:03 +0800
Message-ID: <1504231805-30957-3-git-send-email-douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] hw/acpi-build: Make assignment statement
of next_base easy to read
This patch is just used for readability. so I discard it. and, we
need a test case for the commit
4926403c250f ("hw/acpi-build: Fix SRAT memory building in case of
node 0 without RAM")
So, I re-post this patch. ;-)
However, I would still like to get test results from Peter before
applying this patch again.
I see.
Thanks,
dou
