On 17.10.2017 16:04, Halil Pasic wrote: > Calling do_subchannel_work with no function control flags set in SCSW is > a programming error. Currently the handle this differently in > do_subchannel_work_virtual and do_subchannel_work_passthrough. Let's be > consistent and guard with a common assert against this programming error. > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > Already applied to Connies s390-next. Included for the sake of completenes > (with) the old typo in the commit message.
Looks like Cornelia fixed it up in s390-next :-) > --- > hw/s390x/css.c | 16 ++++------------ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) FWIW: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
