Hi,
I was reading into this after being back from PTO (actually back next monday).
I was wondering as I tested (without openstack) just that last week with Dannf
on the Rally).
And indeed it seems to work for me on Artful (which as we all know is =Ocata in
terms of SW stack).
$ cat arm-template.xml
<domain type='kvm'>
<os>
<type arch='aarch64' machine='virt'>hvm</type>
<loader readonly='yes'
type='pflash'>/usr/share/AAVMF/AAVMF_CODE.fd</loader>
<nvram
template='/usr/share/AAVMF/AAVMF_CODE.fd'>/tmp/AAVMF_CODE.fd</nvram>
<boot dev='hd'/>
</os>
<features>
<acpi/>
<apic/>
<pae/>
</features>
<cpu mode='custom' match='exact'>
<model fallback='allow'>host</model>
</cpu>
<devices>
<interface type='network'>
<source network='default'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
</interface>
<serial type='pty'>
<source path='/dev/pts/3'/>
<target port='0'/>
</serial>
</devices>
</domain>
$ uvt-kvm create --template arm-template.xml --password=ubuntu artful-
test4 release=artful arch=arm64 label=daily
The template is created in a way to let as much as possible for libvirt and
qemu to fill in defaults. That way if one of them change we do not have to
follow and adapt.
Maybe such a thing is happening to you for the more "defined" xml that
openstack is sending.
>From the hosts point of view all looks normal in journal, you see start and
>dhcp discover/offer/ack sequence:
Okt 11 10:45:43 seidel kernel: virbr0: port 2(vnet0) entered learning state
Okt 11 10:45:45 seidel kernel: virbr0: port 2(vnet0) entered forwarding state
Okt 11 10:45:45 seidel kernel: virbr0: topology change detected, propagating
Okt 11 10:46:14 seidel dnsmasq-dhcp[2610]: DHCPDISCOVER(virbr0)
52:54:00:b1:db:89
Okt 11 10:46:14 seidel dnsmasq-dhcp[2610]: DHCPOFFER(virbr0) 192.168.122.13
52:54:00:b1:db:89
Okt 11 10:46:14 seidel dnsmasq-dhcp[2610]: DHCPDISCOVER(virbr0)
52:54:00:b1:db:89
Okt 11 10:46:14 seidel dnsmasq-dhcp[2610]: DHCPOFFER(virbr0) 192.168.122.13
52:54:00:b1:db:89
Okt 11 10:46:14 seidel dnsmasq-dhcp[2610]: DHCPREQUEST(virbr0) 192.168.122.13
52:54:00:b1:db:89
Okt 11 10:46:14 seidel dnsmasq-dhcp[2610]: DHCPACK(virbr0) 192.168.122.13
52:54:00:b1:db:89 ubuntu
The guest also seems "normal" to me:
$ uvt-kvm ssh artful-test4 -- journalctl -u systemd-networkd
-- Logs begin at Wed 2017-10-11 10:46:03 UTC, end at Wed 2017-10-11 11:02:31
UTC. --
Oct 11 10:46:11 ubuntu systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
Oct 11 10:46:11 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: Enumeration completed
Oct 11 10:46:11 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
Oct 11 10:46:11 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: enp1s0: IPv6 successfully enabled
Oct 11 10:46:11 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: enp1s0: Gained carrier
Oct 11 10:46:12 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: enp1s0: Gained IPv6LL
Oct 11 10:46:14 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: enp1s0: DHCPv4 address
192.168.122.13/24 via 192.168.122.1
Oct 11 10:46:14 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: Not connected to system bus,
ignoring transient hostname.
Oct 11 10:46:24 ubuntu systemd-networkd[547]: enp1s0: Configured
The biggest and obviously most important difference is in the networking that
is used:
<interface type='network'>
<mac address='52:54:00:b1:db:89'/>
<source network='default' bridge='virbr0'/>
<target dev='vnet0'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<alias name='net0'/>
<address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00'
function='0x0'/>
</interface>
While openstack generates a type="bridge" network where the bridge is not
managed by libvirt (compared to the default net I use).
Never the less both setups create a bridge and tap the guest on it.
So this should functionally be equivalent other than the bridge setup right?
I tried to make a bridge type config matching to what I had before but close to
yours:
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='52:54:00:b1:db:89'/>
<source bridge='virbr0'/>
<target dev='vnet0'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<alias name='net0'/>
<address type='virtio-mmio'/>
</interface>
But this again works:
ubuntu@artful-test4:~$ journalctl -u systemd-networkd --no-pager
-- Logs begin at Wed 2017-10-11 11:12:10 UTC, end at Wed 2017-10-11 11:13:00
UTC. --
Oct 11 11:12:17 artful-test4 systemd[1]: Starting Network Service...
Oct 11 11:12:17 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: Enumeration completed
Oct 11 11:12:17 artful-test4 systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
Oct 11 11:12:17 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: enp1s0: IPv6 successfully
enabled
Oct 11 11:12:17 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: enp1s0: Gained carrier
Oct 11 11:12:18 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: enp1s0: Gained IPv6LL
Oct 11 11:12:20 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: enp1s0: DHCPv4 address
192.168.122.14/24 via 192.168.122.1
Oct 11 11:12:20 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: Not connected to system
bus, ignoring transient hostname.
Oct 11 11:12:30 artful-test4 systemd-networkd[604]: enp1s0: Configured
Dumping the XML to check if it might have rewritten a lot shows me that my
config is good:
<interface type='bridge'>
<mac address='52:54:00:b1:db:89'/>
<source bridge='virbr0'/>
<target dev='vnet0'/>
<model type='virtio'/>
<alias name='net0'/>
<address type='virtio-mmio'/>
</interface>
So TL;DR a config almost the same as yours works.
Yet the difference is that livbirt has set up 'virbr0' in my case and I'd
assume openstack did create qbrb5d335fc-46 on its own.
As next step I'd recommend iterating your config around different bridge
scenarios to find what breaks it.
Then if reasonable try to exclude openstack from the equation as I shown above
(or not if you think the fix needs to be in openstack).
I hope this helped to get closer to the root casue, but I thought that a
working example on the new Ocata stack might be the best start with.
Note this was done on:
libvirt-daemon-system 3.6.0-1ubuntu4
qemu-kvm 1:2.10+dfsg-0ubuntu1
** Also affects: qemu (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1719196
Title:
[arm64 ocata] newly created instances are unable to raise network
interfaces
Status in libvirt:
New
Status in QEMU:
New
Status in libvirt package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
arm64 Ocata ,
I'm testing to see I can get Ocata running on arm64 and using the
openstack-base bundle to deploy it. I have added the bundle to the
log file attached to this bug.
When I create a new instance via nova, the VM comes up and runs,
however fails to raise its eth0 interface. This occurs on both
internal and external networks.
ubuntu@openstackaw:~$ nova list
+--------------------------------------+---------+--------+------------+-------------+--------------------+
| ID | Name | Status | Task State |
Power State | Networks |
+--------------------------------------+---------+--------+------------+-------------+--------------------+
| dcaf6d51-f81e-4cbd-ac77-0c5d21bde57c | sfeole1 | ACTIVE | - |
Running | internal=10.5.5.3 |
| aa0b8aee-5650-41f4-8fa0-aeccdc763425 | sfeole2 | ACTIVE | - |
Running | internal=10.5.5.13 |
+--------------------------------------+---------+--------+------------+-------------+--------------------+
ubuntu@openstackaw:~$ nova show aa0b8aee-5650-41f4-8fa0-aeccdc763425
+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
| Property | Value
|
+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
| OS-DCF:diskConfig | MANUAL
|
| OS-EXT-AZ:availability_zone | nova
|
| OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:host | awrep3
|
| OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:hypervisor_hostname | awrep3.maas
|
| OS-EXT-SRV-ATTR:instance_name | instance-00000003
|
| OS-EXT-STS:power_state | 1
|
| OS-EXT-STS:task_state | -
|
| OS-EXT-STS:vm_state | active
|
| OS-SRV-USG:launched_at | 2017-09-24T14:23:08.000000
|
| OS-SRV-USG:terminated_at | -
|
| accessIPv4 |
|
| accessIPv6 |
|
| config_drive |
|
| created | 2017-09-24T14:22:41Z
|
| flavor | m1.small
(717660ae-0440-4b19-a762-ffeb32a0575c) |
| hostId |
5612a00671c47255d2ebd6737a64ec9bd3a5866d1233ecf3e988b025 |
| id | aa0b8aee-5650-41f4-8fa0-aeccdc763425
|
| image | zestynosplash
(e88fd1bd-f040-44d8-9e7c-c462ccf4b945) |
| internal network | 10.5.5.13
|
| key_name | mykey
|
| metadata | {}
|
| name | sfeole2
|
| os-extended-volumes:volumes_attached | []
|
| progress | 0
|
| security_groups | default
|
| status | ACTIVE
|
| tenant_id | 9f7a21c1ad264fec81abc09f3960ad1d
|
| updated | 2017-09-24T14:23:09Z
|
| user_id | e6bb6f5178a248c1b5ae66ed388f9040
|
+--------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
As seen above the instances boot an run. Full Console output is
attached to this bug.
[ OK ] Started Initial cloud-init job (pre-networking).
[ OK ] Reached target Network (Pre).
[ OK ] Started AppArmor initialization.
Starting Raise network interfaces...
[FAILED] Failed to start Raise network interfaces.
See 'systemctl status networking.service' for details.
Starting Initial cloud-init job (metadata service crawler)...
[ OK ] Reached target Network.
[ 315.051902] cloud-init[881]: Cloud-init v. 0.7.9 running 'init' at Fri, 22
Sep 2017 18:29:15 +0000. Up 314.70 seconds.
[ 315.057291] cloud-init[881]: ci-info: +++++++++++++++++++++++++++Net
device info+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[ 315.060338] cloud-init[881]: ci-info:
+--------+------+-----------+-----------+-------+-------------------+
[ 315.063308] cloud-init[881]: ci-info: | Device | Up | Address |
Mask | Scope | Hw-Address |
[ 315.066304] cloud-init[881]: ci-info:
+--------+------+-----------+-----------+-------+-------------------+
[ 315.069303] cloud-init[881]: ci-info: | eth0: | True | . | .
| . | fa:16:3e:39:4c:48 |
[ 315.072308] cloud-init[881]: ci-info: | eth0: | True | . | .
| d | fa:16:3e:39:4c:48 |
[ 315.075260] cloud-init[881]: ci-info: | lo: | True | 127.0.0.1 |
255.0.0.0 | . | . |
[ 315.078258] cloud-init[881]: ci-info: | lo: | True | . | .
| d | . |
[ 315.081249] cloud-init[881]: ci-info:
+--------+------+-----------+-----------+-------+-------------------+
[ 315.084240] cloud-init[881]: 2017-09-22 18:29:15,393 -
url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling
'http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id' failed [0/120s]:
request error [HTTPConnectionPool(host='169.254.169.254', port=80): Max retries
exceeded with url: /2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id (Caused by
NewConnectionError('<requests.packages.urllib3.connection.HTTPConnection object
at 0xffffb10794e0>: Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 101] Network
is unreachable',))]
----------------
I have checked all services in neutron and made sure that they are
running and restarted in neutron-gateway
[ + ] neutron-dhcp-agent
[ + ] neutron-l3-agent
[ + ] neutron-lbaasv2-agent
[ + ] neutron-metadata-agent
[ + ] neutron-metering-agent
[ + ] neutron-openvswitch-agent
[ + ] neutron-ovs-cleanup
and have also restarted and checked the nova-compute logs for their
neutron counterparts.
[ + ] neutron-openvswitch-agent
[ + ] neutron-ovs-cleanup
There are some warnings/errors in the neutron-gateway logs which I
have attached the full tarball in a separate attachment to this bug:
2017-09-24 14:39:33.152 10322 INFO ryu.base.app_manager [-] instantiating app
ryu.controller.ofp_handler of OFPHandler
2017-09-24 14:39:33.153 10322 INFO ryu.base.app_manager [-] instantiating app
ryu.app.ofctl.service of OfctlService
2017-09-24 14:39:39.577 10322 ERROR neutron.agent.ovsdb.impl_vsctl
[req-2f084ae8-13dc-47dc-b351-24c8f3c57067 - - - - -] Unable to execute
['ovs-vsctl', '--timeout=10', '--oneline', '--format=json', '--',
'--id=@manager', 'create', 'Manager', 'target="ptcp:6640:127.0.0.1"', '--',
'add', 'Open_vSwitch', '.', 'manager_options', '@manager']. Exception: Exit
code: 1; Stdin: ; Stdout: ; Stderr: ovs-vsctl: transaction error:
{"details":"Transaction causes multiple rows in \"Manager\" table to have
identical values (\"ptcp:6640:127.0.0.1\") for index on column \"target\".
First row, with UUID e02a5f7f-bfd2-4a1d-ae3c-0321db4bd3fb, existed in the
database before this transaction and was not modified by the transaction.
Second row, with UUID 6e9aba3a-471a-4976-bffd-b7131bbe5377, was inserted by
this transaction.","error":"constraint violation"}
These warnings/errors also occur on the nova-compute hosts in
/var/log/neutron/
2017-09-22 18:54:52.130 387556 INFO ryu.base.app_manager [-] instantiating
app ryu.app.ofctl.service of OfctlService
2017-09-22 18:54:56.124 387556 ERROR neutron.agent.ovsdb.impl_vsctl
[req-e291c2f9-a123-422c-be7c-fadaeb5decfa - - - - -] Unable to execute
['ovs-vsctl', '--timeout=10', '--oneline', '--format=json', '--',
'--id=@manager', 'create', 'Manager', 'target="ptcp:6640:127.0.0.1"', '--',
'add', 'Open_vSwitch', '.', 'manager_options', '@manager']. Exception: Exit
code: 1; Stdin: ; Stdout: ; Stderr: ovs-vsctl: transaction error:
{"details":"Transaction causes multiple rows in \"Manager\" table to have
identical values (\"ptcp:6640:127.0.0.1\") for index on column \"target\".
First row, with UUID 9f27ddee-9881-4cbc-9777-2f42fee735e9, was inserted by this
transaction. Second row, with UUID ccf0e097-09d5-449c-b353-6b69781dc3f7,
existed in the database before this transaction and was not modified by the
transaction.","error":"constraint violation"}
I'm not sure if the above error could be pertaining to the failure, I
have also attached those logs to this bug as well...
.
(neutron) agent-list
+--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+-------------------+-------+----------------+---------------------------+
| id | agent_type | host |
availability_zone | alive | admin_state_up | binary |
+--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+-------------------+-------+----------------+---------------------------+
| 0cca03fb-abb2-4704-8b0b-e7d3e117d882 | DHCP agent | awrep1 | nova
| :-) | True | neutron-dhcp-agent |
| 14a5fd52-fbc3-450c-96d5-4e9a65776dad | L3 agent | awrep1 | nova
| :-) | True | neutron-l3-agent |
| 2ebc7238-5e61-41f8-bc60-df14ec6b226b | Loadbalancerv2 agent | awrep1 |
| :-) | True | neutron-lbaasv2-agent |
| 4f6275be-fc8b-4994-bdac-13a4b76f6a83 | Metering agent | awrep1 |
| :-) | True | neutron-metering-agent |
| 86ecc6b0-c100-4298-b861-40c17516cc08 | Open vSwitch agent | awrep1 |
| :-) | True | neutron-openvswitch-agent |
| 947ad3ab-650b-4b96-a520-00441ecb33e7 | Open vSwitch agent | awrep4 |
| :-) | True | neutron-openvswitch-agent |
| 996b0692-7d19-4641-bec3-e057f4a856f6 | Open vSwitch agent | awrep3 |
| :-) | True | neutron-openvswitch-agent |
| ab6b1065-0b98-4cf3-9f46-6bddba0c5e75 | Metadata agent | awrep1 |
| :-) | True | neutron-metadata-agent |
| fe24f622-b77c-4eed-ae22-18e4195cf763 | Open vSwitch agent | awrep2 |
| :-) | True | neutron-openvswitch-agent |
+--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+-------------------+-------+----------------+---------------------------+
Should neutron-openvswitch be assigned to the 'nova' availability zone?
I have also attached the ovs-vsctl show from a nova-compute host and
the neutron-gateway host to ensure that the open v switch routes are
correct.
I can supply more logs if required.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libvirt/+bug/1719196/+subscriptions
