On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 18:04:59 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:08:02PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > DEFINE_TYPES() will help to simplify following routine patterns:
> >
> > static void foo_register_types(void)
> > {
> > type_register_static(&foo1_type_info);
> > type_register_static(&foo2_type_info);
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > type_init(foo_register_types)
> >
> > or
> >
> > static void foo_register_types(void)
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(type_infos); i++) {
> > type_register_static(&type_infos[i]);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > type_init(foo_register_types)
> >
> > with a single line
> >
> > DEFINE_TYPES(type_infos)
> >
> > where types have static definition which could be consolidated in
> > a single array of TypeInfo structures.
> > It saves us ~6-10LOC per use case and would help to replace
> > imperative foo_register_types() there with declarative style of
> > type registration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
>
> I will wait for 1 day or 2 before queueing it.
Thanks!
I'll respin whole series with amended "foo: cleanup cpu type name composition"
patches due to s/type_init_from_array/DEFINE_TYPES/ change
