On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:17:54 +0200 Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> I see no point if PCI disable machines. There is no non-PCI x86 machine > besides the isapc. But this has no version whatsoever so it certainly > is not made for being migrated. > As far as I can see and we would make things much more complex. > > non-PCI will trigger other issues. e.g. zpci and aen is part of the z14 cpu > model > since 2.10. Really this is not helping, its making things worse. What about creating the phb depending upon pci_available? Has no impact for normal builds unless you muck around manually... > If you really want to avoid PCI for whatever redhat is doing, can't you just > hide > it in a rhel specific machine (which you seem to have anyway for x86 and > power)? ...but makes it easier to disable it correctly, if wanted.
