On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 05:32:24PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Both -nodefconfig and -no-user-config options do the same thing
> today, we only need one variable to keep track of them.
What reason for picking -nodefconfig instead of -no-user-config to
deprecate ? -nodefconfig predates -no-user-config by a few years,
and is what libvirt has historically used. So from libvirt POV
we'd have a slight preference to deprecate -no-user-config instead
and keep -nodefconfig, simply to avoid need to add conditional
logic to libvirt to pick which to use.
>
> Suggested-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
> ---
> vl.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c
> index 4fd01fda91..b347a97a5b 100644
> --- a/vl.c
> +++ b/vl.c
> @@ -3093,7 +3093,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> const char *qtest_log = NULL;
> const char *pid_file = NULL;
> const char *incoming = NULL;
> - bool defconfig = true;
> bool userconfig = true;
> bool nographic = false;
> DisplayType display_type = DT_DEFAULT;
> @@ -3194,8 +3193,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> popt = lookup_opt(argc, argv, &optarg, &optind);
> switch (popt->index) {
> case QEMU_OPTION_nodefconfig:
> - defconfig = false;
> - break;
> case QEMU_OPTION_nouserconfig:
> userconfig = false;
> break;
> @@ -3203,7 +3200,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp)
> }
> }
>
> - if (defconfig && userconfig) {
> + if (userconfig) {
> if (qemu_read_default_config_file() < 0) {
> exit(1);
> }
> --
> 2.13.5
>
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
