Quoting Alex Bennée (2017-09-21 06:06:25) > The mmio path (see exec.c:prepare_mmio_access) already protects itself > against recursive locking and it makes sense to do the same for > io_readx/writex. Otherwise any helper running in the BQL context will > assert when it attempts to write to device memory as in the case of > the bug report. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > CC: Richard Jones <rjo...@redhat.com> > CC: Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org>
FYI: this patch has been tagged for stable 2.10.1, but is not yet upstream. Patch freeze for 2.10.1 is September 27th. > --- > accel/tcg/cputlb.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c > index e72415a882..bcbcc4db6c 100644 > --- a/accel/tcg/cputlb.c > +++ b/accel/tcg/cputlb.c > @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ static uint64_t io_readx(CPUArchState *env, CPUIOTLBEntry > *iotlbentry, > > cpu->mem_io_vaddr = addr; > > - if (mr->global_locking) { > + if (mr->global_locking && !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked()) { > qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(); > locked = true; > } > @@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ static void io_writex(CPUArchState *env, CPUIOTLBEntry > *iotlbentry, > cpu->mem_io_vaddr = addr; > cpu->mem_io_pc = retaddr; > > - if (mr->global_locking) { > + if (mr->global_locking && !qemu_mutex_iothread_locked()) { > qemu_mutex_lock_iothread(); > locked = true; > } > -- > 2.14.1 > >