On 18.09.2017 18:00, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Preparation for TCG, for KVM is this is completely handled in the
> kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/cpu.h | 2 ++
> target/s390x/sigp.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> index 5d03802c7d..5aa755d7b5 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
> @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ struct sysib_322 {
> #define SIGP_SET_PREFIX 0x0d
> #define SIGP_STORE_STATUS_ADDR 0x0e
> #define SIGP_SET_ARCH 0x12
> +#define SIGP_SENSE_RUNNING 0x15
> #define SIGP_STORE_ADTL_STATUS 0x17
>
> /* SIGP condition codes */
> @@ -604,6 +605,7 @@ struct sysib_322 {
>
> /* SIGP status bits */
> #define SIGP_STAT_EQUIPMENT_CHECK 0x80000000UL
> +#define SIGP_STAT_NOT_RUNNING 0x00000400UL
> #define SIGP_STAT_INCORRECT_STATE 0x00000200UL
> #define SIGP_STAT_INVALID_PARAMETER 0x00000100UL
> #define SIGP_STAT_EXT_CALL_PENDING 0x00000080UL
> diff --git a/target/s390x/sigp.c b/target/s390x/sigp.c
> index 9587c3d319..c57312b743 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/sigp.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/sigp.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,28 @@ static void sigp_set_prefix(CPUState *cs,
> run_on_cpu_data arg)
> si->cc = SIGP_CC_ORDER_CODE_ACCEPTED;
> }
>
> +static void sigp_sense_running(S390CPU *dst_cpu, SigpInfo *si)
> +{
> + if (!tcg_enabled()) {
> + /* handled in KVM */
> + set_sigp_status(si, SIGP_STAT_INVALID_ORDER);
> + return;
> + }
If we're sure that this is always handled in the kernel, I think you
could simply do a "g_assert(tcg_enabled())" here instead?
Thomas
