From: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
Instead of using the hardcoded (MemTxAttrs){0} for no memory attributes
let's use the already defined MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED macro instead.
This is technically a change of behaviour as MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED sets
the unspecified field to 1, but it doesn't look like anything is
checking this field.
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru>
---
target/xtensa/op_helper.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/xtensa/op_helper.c b/target/xtensa/op_helper.c
index 519fbeddd6..3d990c0caa 100644
--- a/target/xtensa/op_helper.c
+++ b/target/xtensa/op_helper.c
@@ -1025,11 +1025,11 @@ void HELPER(ule_s)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t br,
float32 a, float32 b)
uint32_t HELPER(rer)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t addr)
{
return address_space_ldl(env->address_space_er, addr,
- (MemTxAttrs){0}, NULL);
+ MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
}
void HELPER(wer)(CPUXtensaState *env, uint32_t data, uint32_t addr)
{
address_space_stl(env->address_space_er, addr, data,
- (MemTxAttrs){0}, NULL);
+ MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
}
--
2.11.0
