On 13.09.2017 16:27, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13.09.2017 15:24, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> This allows us to drop inclusion of cpu_models.h in cpu-qom.h, and
>> prepares for using cpu-qom.h as a s390 specific version of typedefs.h
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  target/s390x/cpu-qom.h    | 5 ++++-
>>  target/s390x/cpu.h        | 5 +++--
>>  target/s390x/cpu_models.h | 8 ++++----
>>  3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> [...]
>> diff --git a/target/s390x/cpu.h b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> index 372f7d8885..4a0a59dfbc 100644
>> --- a/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/s390x/cpu.h
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>  
>>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>>  #include "cpu-qom.h"
>> +#include "cpu_models.h"
> 
> Do we really need to include cpu_models.h here? Looking at your changes
> below, it does not seem to be necessary?

Yes, due to s390_has_feat(), and I want to avoid cleaning all the other
calling places up in this patch.


-- 

Thanks,

David

Reply via email to