----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Snow" <js...@redhat.com>
> To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonz...@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: kw...@redhat.com, qemu-bl...@nongnu.org
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 12:22:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-block] [PATCH 00/12] cleanup qemu-iotests
> 
> 
> 
> On 08/09/2017 05:54 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > The purpose of this series is to separate the "check" sources from
> > the tests.  After these patches, common.config is reduced to simple
> > shell initialization, and common.rc is only included by the tests.
> > 
> > Along the way, a lot of dead code is removed too.
> > 
> > Paolo
> > 
> > Paolo Bonzini (12):
> >   qemu-iotests: remove dead code
> >   qemu-iotests: get rid of AWK_PROG
> >   qemu-iotests: move "check" code out of common.rc
> >   qemu-iotests: limit non-_PROG-suffixed variables to common.rc
> >   qemu-iotests: do not include common.rc in "check"
> >   qemu-iotests: do not do useless search for QEMU_*_PROG
> >   qemu-iotests: disintegrate more parts of common.config
> >   qemu-iotests: fix uninitialized variable
> >   qemu-iotests: do not search for binaries in the current directory
> >   qemu-iotests: get rid of $iam
> >   qemu-iotests: include common.env and common.config early
> >   qemu-iotests: merge "check" and "common"
> > 
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/039.out       |  10 +-
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/061.out       |   4 +-
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/137.out       |   2 +-
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/check         | 551
> >  ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/common        | 459 --------------------------------
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/common.config | 205 +--------------
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/common.qemu   |   1 +
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc     | 225 ++++++++--------
> >  8 files changed, 615 insertions(+), 842 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/common
> > 
> 
> Stale? Patchset is >1 month old now, doesn't look like it got merged.

Yup, didn't get reviewed by Kevin either...  I was waiting for that
before sending v2.

Paolo

Reply via email to