On Sat, Sep 09, 2017 at 11:41:55PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 September 2017 at 21:30, Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: > > However, I have a suggestion for Igor: making a separate patch > > that renames the existing property to "x-cpu-model", and using > > "x-cpu-type" in this series. This way we will explicitly > > document the fact that the property is not a stable > > user/management interface. > > We have lots and lots of properties on non-user-instantiated > devices that aren't intended as user level configurable > things...
Well, we need to deal with them somehow, otherwise we have no simple way to know if removing/renaming a property is really safe or not. -- Eduardo
