On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:45:25 +0200 Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> The discussion seems to have settled down quite a bit. Since there weren't > many complaints, I would like to opt for a v2 fixing the things pointed out > during the review early next week (I was thinking Tuesday maybe some late > birds > are going to join in). > > @Connie > ======== > > Does that sound reasonable or would you like more time for v1? No, sounds good. > > What do you think, would it make more sense to omit or to keep the testing > stuff for v2 (I mean patch 5 and the kernel module in the cover letter)? Can you maybe split this out? It makes it easier if you don't have to go hunt in a cover letter. > > You probably haven't found the time to look at have a glance at "s390x/css: > drop > data-check in interpretation" (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/810995/). We > have said it would make some things more straight forward here, and I could > drop that ugly TODO comment. I think it's quite straight-forward, and I would > not mind having a decision on it before v2 or putting it as preparation into > v2. What do you prefer? It is marked for my attention. I don't know whether I find time to look at it today, but probably early next week.
