On 11/26/10 16:19, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 26.11.2010, at 16:10, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 26 November 2010 14:21, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: >> >>> But the key point is breadth, it should not be a "KVM Forum" but rather an >>> Open Virtualization conference with topics as high level as cloud software >>> automation and as low level as asynchronous page faults :-) >> >> Does that breadth include the emulation/TCG side of qemu or only >> the virtualisation/KVM side? I'm never quite sure with titles that >> just say "Virtualization"... > > Historically, virtualization gatherings have been fairly non-tcg friendly. I > don't see why we'd have to continue that trend though. A lot of the code > actually affects both sides.
IMHO it would be good to have focus on broader QEMU collaboration, including TCG. Cheers, Jes