Hi
> Suggest you show us cool things you can do with clang-tidy that haven't > been done with Coccinelle :) > > Well to do that I would have to have a transformations to do & know the limits/strength of coccinelle & clang-tidy, I am not there yet... Today, I prefer invest in clang-tidy for what I need to do. We already discussed some of the pros/cons of coccinelle vs tidy her and in the previous round-up series. For ex, clang-tidy is able to evaluate constant expressions, so you can write generic rules that you can't capture with coccinelle yet (A + B-1) / B * B: https://github.com/elmarco/clang-tools-extra/blob/master/clang-tidy/qemu/RoundCheck.cpp . However, I think it is more difficult to write clang-tidy transformation that spans accross various code paths (like adding errors/free/locks etc). Coccinelle makes that fairly easily apparently. -- Marc-André Lureau
