On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 19:28:31 +0200
David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 18.08.2017 18:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > Suggesting to add a patch description like: "The functions are not used
> > in target/s390x/ so a header in hw/s390x/ is a better place" ?  
> 
> Sure, I will include that, thanks!

No worries, I'm including that on applying.

> 
> > 
> > On 18.08.2017 13:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:  
> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h | 2 ++
> >>  target/s390x/cpu.h     | 3 ---
> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)  
> > 
> > Anyway:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> >   
> 
> 


Reply via email to