On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 19:28:31 +0200 David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 18.08.2017 18:11, Thomas Huth wrote: > > Suggesting to add a patch description like: "The functions are not used > > in target/s390x/ so a header in hw/s390x/ is a better place" ? > > Sure, I will include that, thanks! No worries, I'm including that on applying. > > > > > On 18.08.2017 13:43, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> hw/s390x/s390-virtio.h | 2 ++ > >> target/s390x/cpu.h | 3 --- > >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Anyway: > > > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > > > >