Hi Eduardo,
At 08/24/2017 01:25 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 09:35:29PM +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
Hi Igor,
At 08/23/2017 08:45 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 20:12:51 +0800
Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
Hi Igor,
At 08/23/2017 04:40 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 11:24:10 +0800
Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
As QEMU supports the memory-less node, it is possible that there is
no RAM in the first numa node(also be called as node0). eg:
... \
-m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G \
-numa node -numa node,mem=128M \
But, this makes it hard for QEMU to build a known-to-work ACPI SRAT
table. Only fixing it is not enough.
Add a testcase for this situation to make sure the ACPI table is
correct for guest.
Suggested-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 6463 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SLIT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 264 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 9147 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SLIT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 48 bytes
tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem | Bin 0 -> 264 bytes
tests/bios-tables-test.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/DSDT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SLIT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/pc/SRAT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/DSDT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SLIT.numamem
create mode 100644 tests/acpi-test-data/q35/SRAT.numamem
considering only SRAT table has been changed and the other
tables match with default blobs, I'd suggest to keep only
Our testcase is：
+ test_acpi_one(" -m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G"
+ " -numa node -numa node,mem=128"
+ " -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=21",
+ &data);
The DSDT and SLIT don't match with default blobs.
do you actually need SLIT table /i.e. -numa dist/ for test at all?
it looks not relevant for the test case at the hand,
I'd suggest to drop '-numa dist' option for the test.
OK, Got it, will drop '-numa dist' option in next version.
So, they can't be dropped.
I wonder what's changed, could you post DSDT diff here?
Just like memory hot-plug cases, when we use the '-m
128,slots=3,maxmem=1G' option, As the ACPI spec said, There may be some
Memory Device in the DSDT table.
Do you really need to use -m 128,slots=3,maxmem=1G to test your
bug fix?
I was wrong, As the default memory for x86 is 128Mb, I will remove this
option to make one case just do one thing.
Thanks,
dou.
