On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:01:15 +0300 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
> 28.07.2017 12:41, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:55:47 +0300 > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > > > >> To make logs more readable prefix all hex values with '0x' mark. > >> This is needed for consistency too, as a lot of hex values are already > >> prefixed with '0x'. Also, bring all hex outputs to the common form - > >> use '%#', not '0x%'. > > This is problematic if you try to match up things in the trace with > > things that don't have the leading 0x elsewhere. See my comments on the > > s390x changes below. > > Hmm, not so easy.. > > All your remarks satisfy the following criteria (and it seems logical > anyway): > > hex numbers grouped into patterns like NUM.NUM.NUM (several numbers > splitted by period) are allowed to be printed without 0x prefixes. Works for me. There might be other similar patterns, though.
