On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:02:27 +0200 Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 28.07.2017 07:35, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index ddf6f3f6d8..69987b5e5b 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@ S: Supported > > F: hw/vfio/ccw.c > > F: hw/s390x/s390-ccw.c > > F: include/hw/s390x/s390-ccw.h > > +F: linux-headers/linux/vfio_ccw.h > > Again a linux-header ... I don't think we need an entry for this in > MAINTAINERS since the file is maintained in the Linux kernel instead. Agreed, even if it's the same maintainer in this case. What about a catchall pattern for the linux-headers instead that points to the update-headers script? If you're updating these without running the script, you're doing something wrong (as soon as the patchset is ready for inclusion, at least.)
