CC. Fam and David.
Any idea about it?
Thanks
Zhang Chen
On 07/25/2017 09:02 AM, wang.yong...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>On 24/07/2017 12:38, wang.yong...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll in the
>> iothread_run function.
>
>That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
>unfortunately. aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.
Hi Paolo,
Any other good idea to achieve this?
Thanks
>
>Paolo
>
>> After that IOThread
>> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work
together.
>>
>> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit
原始邮件
*发件人:*<pbonz...@redhat.com>;
*收件人:*王勇10170530;<stefa...@redhat.com>;<jasow...@redhat.com>;<marcandre.lur...@gmail.com>;
*抄送人:*<zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>;<zhangchen.f...@cn.fujitsu.com>;<lizhij...@cn.fujitsu.com>;<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>;王广10165992;
*日 期 :*2017年07月24日 19:59
*主 题 :**Re: [PATCHv2 02/04] colo-compare: Processpactkets in the
IOThreadofthe primary*
On 24/07/2017 12:38, wang.yong...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> finally use g_main_loop_run to replace aio_poll in the
> iothread_run function.
That would make the performance of virtio-blk with iothreads worse,
unfortunately. aio_poll is much more optimized than g_main_loop_run.
Paolo
> After that IOThread
> runs the GMainContext event loop,chardev and IOThread can work together.
>
> How about it? If feasible, I will try to submit a patch.
--
Thanks
Zhang Chen