On 07/26/2017 01:05 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 26.07.2017 18:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 07/26/2017 12:04 PM, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Starting qemu-system-unicore32 without the -kernel parameter results in
an assert() returns false and aborts qemu. This patch replaces it with a
proper error message followed by exit(1).
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <ot...@redhat.com>
---
hw/unicore32/puv3.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/unicore32/puv3.c b/hw/unicore32/puv3.c
index e9d1a60b6f..ff62efb4df 100644
--- a/hw/unicore32/puv3.c
+++ b/hw/unicore32/puv3.c
@@ -92,7 +92,10 @@ static void puv3_load_kernel(const char
*kernel_filename)
if (kernel_filename == NULL && qtest_enabled()) {
return;
}
- assert(kernel_filename != NULL);
+ if (kernel_filename == NULL) {
+ error_report("kernel parameter cannot be empty");
+ exit(1);
+ }
This seems a temporary kludge for 2.10 but not the correct long-term fix.
As commented in another thread [1] where I got a bit discomfited, it'd
be nice if during the 2.11 schedule the industry provide some help to
clean/unify the loader.c code, ideally remove all duplicated code not
arch-specific and use hw/core/loader*.
[1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-07/msg06760.html
Sorry, but this here *is* a machine-specific problem. I fail to see how
this should be related to the hw/core/loader.c code?
Yes, this assert is a problem, same as the one in xen_load_linux() and
this is a surgical fix, indeed.
I probably misused the "kludge" word, sorry. My comment was about
long-term use of -kernel.
Maybe I didn't point to the correct file, I was thinking about the
various hw/$arch/boot.c. My feeling is the -kernel parameter started as
something simple years ago then grow and now his usage is somehow
abused. I'd rather see a common hw/core/boot.c with each arch just
adding arch-related fixes.
For example in hw/arm/boot.c, see arm_load_kernel_notify(), except
features parsing, initrd_start and the fixupcontext part, most of the
code is multiarch and could benefit other archs less lov^H^H^Hsupported.
arm_load_kernel() is generic. In load_dtb() only the acells/scells is
arm-specific and could replace dup microblaze code, work on mips, etc.
Regards,
Phil.