Richard Henderson writes:
> We have generated an exception, so use DISAS_NORETURN.
Shouldn't this be folded into patch 4?
Thanks,
Lluis
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
> ---
> target/arm/translate-a64.c | 1 +
> target/arm/translate.c | 4 +++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/target/arm/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> index 342ff7c..657684b 100644
> --- a/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> +++ b/target/arm/translate-a64.c
> @@ -11285,6 +11285,7 @@ void gen_intermediate_code_a64(CPUState *cs,
> TranslationBlock *tb)
dc-> is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
> } else {
> gen_exception_internal_insn(dc, 0, EXCP_DEBUG);
> + dc->is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
> /* The address covered by the breakpoint must be
> included in [tb->pc, tb->pc + tb->size) in order
> to for it to be properly cleared -- thus we
> diff --git a/target/arm/translate.c b/target/arm/translate.c
> index 2ae68ce..83e5491 100644
> --- a/target/arm/translate.c
> +++ b/target/arm/translate.c
> @@ -11942,6 +11942,7 @@ void gen_intermediate_code(CPUState *cs,
> TranslationBlock *tb)
dc-> is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE;
> } else {
> gen_exception_internal_insn(dc, 0, EXCP_DEBUG);
> + dc->is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
> /* The address covered by the breakpoint must be
> included in [tb->pc, tb->pc + tb->size) in order
> to for it to be properly cleared -- thus we
> @@ -11986,7 +11987,8 @@ void gen_intermediate_code(CPUState *cs,
> TranslationBlock *tb)
> assert(num_insns == 1);
> gen_exception(EXCP_UDEF, syn_swstep(dc->ss_same_el, 0, 0),
> default_exception_el(dc));
> - goto done_generating;
> + dc->is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
> + break;
> }
> if (dc->thumb) {
> --
> 2.9.4
