>On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 21:49:37 -0400 >Yi Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Add [vcpu] index support for hmp command "info lapic", which is >> useful when debugging ipi and so on. Current behavior is not >> changed when the parameter isn't specified. >we shouldn't expose cpu_index to users anymore, > >I would suggest using to use real APIC ID here but we don't >have monitor command that returns APIC IDs for present cpus. Would you like to explain the reason we shouldn't use cpu_index any more, which is more straightforward than socket-id/core-id/thread-id? As Eduardo wrote in the next reply, "CPU #<n>" is already a perfectly good identifier for a human interface :-) Many thanks. --- Best wishes Yi Wang
