On 17.07.2017 20:14, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 07/17/2017 07:30 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 14.07.2017 12:41, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjhe...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> >>> Some new guest features have been introduced recently. Let's wire >>> them up in the CPU model. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <jjhe...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >>> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> >>> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> >>> [split patch] >>> --- >> >> Would it make sense to add further checks to check_consistency? >> >> I think e.g. vx extensions should rely on vx. I can't see a new PoP out >> there, so I can't check. > > Yes, the vx extensions depend on vx and it makes sense to have a dependeny for > both extension.
Just realized that I missed these checks, they are already properly in place :) -- Thanks, David
