On 16.11.2010, at 18:20, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 11/16/2010 10:59 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> Surely, only if it is running on a Xen Dom0. If you use -M xenpv on a KVM >>> host, then -M xenpv should imply -machine accel=kvm (ie it would be using >>> xenner) >>> >> Actually, it should imply -machine accel=kvm,tcg :). Accelerators really are >> not a machine property. In an ideal world, -M pc would just work with xen >> hvm if -accel xen is given. >> > > No, an accelerator is both a CPU selection and a machine characteristic. For > KVM, we overload -cpu to modify both the KVM CPU and the TCG CPU both this > won't work with accel=xen. We probably shouldn't do this with KVM either > because there's a significant different between trying to do cpuid masking > with KVM and modifying the TCG cpu emulation support. > > Both KVM and Xen have other impacts on the platform devices though. KVM does > not support SMM so it disables that in the i440fx. KVM prefers to use it's > own in-kernel local APIC (and IOAPIC). That makes it a property of the > machine.
So you're saying the machine should define an accel mask of accels it supports? However all this ends up internally, giving the user an easy option to choose accels would still be nice. Users don't use -device or -machine. They want shortcuts :). Alex
