Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote: > Abstracted from migrate_set_block_enabled() to allocate > MigrationCapabilityStatusList properly. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> Nitpick > -void migrate_set_block_enabled(bool value, Error **errp) > +static MigrationCapabilityStatusList *migrate_cap_add( > + MigrationCapabilityStatusList *head, We have a parameter called head > + MigrationCapability index, > + bool state) > { > MigrationCapabilityStatusList *cap; > > cap = g_new0(MigrationCapabilityStatusList, 1); > cap->value = g_new0(MigrationCapabilityStatus, 1); > - cap->value->capability = MIGRATION_CAPABILITY_BLOCK; > - cap->value->state = value; > + cap->value->capability = index; > + cap->value->state = state; > + cap->next = head; > + > + return cap; But we don't do the *head = cap? Pelhaps is better to call it "next" or "list"?