From: "Denis V. Lunev" <d...@openvz.org>

We've had a shadowed 'ret' variable, which risks returning the wrong
value, introduced in commit b9c64947.

Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <d...@openvz.org>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170710150559.30163-1-...@openvz.org
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
CC: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
CC: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>
---
 block/io.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index b413727..a73153d 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2335,7 +2335,6 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs, 
int64_t offset,
     assert(max_pdiscard >= bs->bl.request_alignment);
 
     while (bytes > 0) {
-        int ret;
         int num = bytes;
 
         if (head) {
-- 
2.9.4


Reply via email to