Make it clear that the name parameter to visit_start_struct() has the same semantics as for visit_start_int().
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> --- include/qapi/visitor.h | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/qapi/visitor.h b/include/qapi/visitor.h index b0a048f..dc09cc7 100644 --- a/include/qapi/visitor.h +++ b/include/qapi/visitor.h @@ -60,13 +60,13 @@ * visitors are declared here; the remaining visitors are generated in * qapi-visit.h. * - * The @name parameter of visit_type_FOO() describes the relation - * between this QAPI value and its parent container. When visiting - * the root of a tree, @name is ignored; when visiting a member of an - * object, @name is the key associated with the value; when visiting a - * member of a list, @name is NULL; and when visiting the member of an - * alternate, @name should equal the name used for visiting the - * alternate. + * The @name parameter of visit_type_FOO() and visit_start_OBJECT() + * describes the relation between this QAPI value and its parent + * container. When visiting the root of a tree, @name is ignored; + * when visiting a member of an object, @name is the key associated + * with the value; when visiting a member of a list, @name is NULL; + * and when visiting the member of an alternate, @name should equal + * the name used for visiting the alternate. * * The visit_type_FOO() functions expect a non-null @obj argument; * they allocate *@obj during input visits, leave it unchanged on -- 2.9.4
