On 07/14/2017 10:36 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 July 2017 at 17:18, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The following changes since commit 3d0bf8dfdfebd7f2ae41b6f220444b8047d6b1ee:
>>
>>   Merge remote-tracking branch 
>> 'remotes/dgilbert/tags/pull-migration-20170710a' into staging (2017-07-10 
>> 18:13:03 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>   git://github.com/berrange/qemu tags/pull-sockets-2017-07-11-2
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 4b1ac1b3abf0d07cd4d9f9011f12d62bff27154c:
>>
>>   tests: add functional test validating ipv4/ipv6 address flag handling 
>> (2017-07-12 16:49:00 +0100)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Merge sockets 2017/07/11 v2
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Daniel P. Berrange (5):
>>   sockets: ensure we can bind to both ipv4 & ipv6 separately
>>   sockets: don't block IPv4 clients when listening on "::"
>>   sockets: ensure we don't accept IPv4 clients when IPv4 is disabled
>>   io: preserve ipv4/ipv6 flags when resolving InetSocketAddress
>>   tests: add functional test validating ipv4/ipv6 address flag handling
> 
> This failed 'make check' on s390x host:
> 
> TEST: tests/test-sockets-proto... (pid=28872)
>   /sockets/migrate/wildcard/all:                                       OK
> [...]
>   /sockets/chardev/::/ipv4onipv6on:                                    OK
>   /sockets/chardev/::/ipv4offipv6off:                                  OK
>   /sockets/net/wildcard/all:                                           **
> ERROR:/home/linux1/qemu/tests/test-sockets-proto.c:849:test_listen:
> assertion failed: (data->ipv4 == 0)
> FAIL
> GTester: last random seed: R02S575d305465be93e6120318b4f8434263
> (pid=29314)
> FAIL: tests/test-sockets-proto
> 


FWIW, I tried to reproduce on my system (Fedora 24 s390x), 
but qemu/master + this pull + configure + make check did compile the 
test-sockets-proto
test, but it does not execute it. Any idea why not?

Running it manually did succeed, though. (no errors) 


Reply via email to