On 04/07/2017 10:51, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:42:33 +0200
> Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03.07.2017 15:14, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>> CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1 is 0x004E0100, so this is the POWER9 v1.0.
>>>
>>> When we run qemu on a POWER9 DD1 host, we must use either
>>> "-cpu host" or "-cpu POWER9", but in the latter case it fails with
>>>
>>> Unable to find sPAPR CPU Core definition
>>>
>>> because POWER9 DD1 doesn't appear in the list of known CPUs.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes this by defining POWER9_v1.0 with POWER9 DD1
>>> PVR instead of CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE. It also adds POWER_v2.0
>>> with POWER9 DD2 PVR to avoid to trigger kernel POWER9 DD1 workaround
>>> in TCG mode.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 5 ++++-
>>> target/ppc/cpu-models.c | 6 ++++--
>>> target/ppc/cpu-models.h | 1 +
>>> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
>>> index 9fb896b..00918a5 100644
>>> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
>>> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c
>>> @@ -249,8 +249,11 @@ static const char *spapr_core_models[] = {
>>> /* POWER8NVL */
>>> "POWER8NVL_v1.0",
>>>
>>> - /* POWER9 */
>>> + /* POWER9 DD1 */
>>> "POWER9_v1.0",
>>> +
>>> + /* POWER9 DD2 */
>>> + "POWER9_v2.0",
>>
>> In case you re-spin, what about a more compact listing:
>>
>> /* POWER9 */
>> "POWER9_v1.0",
>> "POWER9_v2.0",
>>
>> ?
>>
>
> I second that but anyway:
>
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
>
>> Anyway, patch looks good to me, so:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
>
I agree, but as I was focused on the problem with "-cpu POWER9" I forgot
to update the first patch.
Thanks,
Laurent
