On 11/10/10 18:14, Gleb Natapov wrote:
This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment on.
I am using open firmware naming scheme to specify device path names.
Names look like this on pci machine:
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1,1/dr...@1/d...@0
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1/f...@03f1/flo...@1
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1/f...@03f1/flo...@0
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1,1/dr...@1/d...@1
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1,1/dr...@0/d...@0
/p...@i0cf8/s...@3/d...@0
/p...@i0cf8/ether...@4/ethernet-...@0
/p...@i0cf8/ether...@5/ethernet-...@0
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1,1/dr...@0/d...@1
/p...@i0cf8/i...@1/i...@01e8/dr...@0/d...@0
/p...@i0cf8/u...@1,2/netw...@0/ether...@0
/p...@i0cf8/u...@1,2/h...@1/netw...@0/ether...@0
Good stuff overall, but see replies to patches for some nits.
IIRC some powerpc (+sparc?) boards pass a device tree to the guest. So
with this (and maybe some more bits) we might be able to dynamically
generate a device tree from our qdev tree? Any comments from the
ppc/sparc folks on this?
cheers,
Gerd