Emilio G Cota writes:

> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 14:21:29 +0300, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> Emilio G Cota writes:
>> > I wanted to save you some time and sent a v9 yesterday with these
>> > same changes -- although I see some changes in my v8 didn't make it
>> > to your v9. For this iteration I only added more perf numbers to the
>> > last patch, see here:
>> >   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-06/msg05764.html
>> 
>> Woops, sorry about the duplicate effort.
>> 
>> I just dropped the rename of variable trace_ds, since I prefer names whose
>> purpose can be more easily understood.

> - I think trace_vcpu_dstate is way too long (IMO a short name + a comment
>   in the struct is better).

> - You missed a change I made to patch 3:
>> [cota: use CPU_TRACE_DSTATE_MAX_EVENTS instead of 
>> trace_get_vcpu_event_count()]
>   Was that intentional?

No it wasn't. I'll look into it for the next series.


> - Would be nice to include the perf numbers I got, along with yours.

I'll add them to the cover and commit message.


Thanks,
  Lluis

Reply via email to